Adventures, and their Different Forms

I first read The Hobbit when I was about thirteen years old. Since then I think I’ve read it about four times over, but I’ve never appreciated the book more than when I read it during my first semester at university. The line that stood out to me most: “adventures are not all pony-rides in May sunshine”.

This may seem a fairly inconsequential line. And maybe it wasn’t written with any deeper meaning intended. The quote, as I’ve copied it down, is just a few words in a much longer sentence in the actual book, so that I barely noticed it during the first readings.

But here’s the thing: for me, university was an adventure. Living away from my parents for the first time was an adventure. Adult life in general was one big adventure that I had somehow found myself wound up in, and having Bilbo with me, wanting desperately to just give up and go home, was – and is – a great comfort to me.

This is why I love The Hobbit so much. It acknowledges that, no, adventures are never a smooth ride. And you might want to avoid going on one in the first place, lest you make yourself late for dinner. And once you’re out there, there will be times that you’ll want nothing more than to be back at home, safe and sound and comfortable once again.

But going home isn’t always possible. More important, it isn’t always the right thing to do. Adventures may not be all pony-rides in May sunshine, but they are necessary, and they are most definitely good for you.

Adventures are also not all of one sort. And if Bilbo can face Smaug the Magnificent, Chiefest and Greatest of Calamities, then I can at least attempt to face my own life, whatever that may entail.

Good Omens: The Them and the Horsepersons of the Apocalypse

It wasn’t until a while after I finished reading Good Omens by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett that I noticed the strong link between the Them and the four Horsepersons of the Apocalypse. I think that this link was probably supposed to be more obvious but it took me a while to get and once I did get it, it made me enjoy the book all the more. 

Towards the end of the book, each member of the Them fights one-on-one against a Horseperson, but what I didn’t notice immediately was how suited each of the Them were to their match. It’s as if Adam was subconsciously assembling his own Riders of the Apocalypse for this very moment, which is in all likelihood the case. 

Pepper as War was probably the most obvious. Aside from being the only woman of the group and having red hair, she fights more fiercely and aggressively than any of her friends, especially if someone makes fun of her name. Brian was a clear match for Pollution, since he’s described as being constantly dirty and tends to leave empty crisp packets lying around wherever he’s been sitting. Wensleydale, with his serious disposition and interest in maths, naturally became the Famine of the group. 

And that leaves Adam as Death. It’s disturbing to compare an eleven-year-old with Death – even more so perhaps than with War, Famine and Pollution – but it fits well. Adam is undoubtedly the leader of the group. He’s above the rest of the Them in that his imagination is more powerful and he has certain powers that humans shouldn’t have. When Adam makes a decision, the Them agree with him without thinking. But he’s also set apart from them a little. They may all be friends, but Adam isn’t quite like the others, and he even starts to scare them at one point. So I think what excited me most about this link between the Them and the Horsepersons was the understanding that existed between Adam and Death at the end of the book, just before things went back to normal. 

Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell

I read this book as a sort of “comfort read.” I was looking for something that would be quick, fun and easy, and Fangirl had the added advantage of being about a girl starting university, which I am currently feeling pretty nervous about.
As I’ve mentioned, Fangirl is about the first year of university for Cath, a fanfiction writer who is unsure how to navigate uni, especially since her twin sister no longer wants to share a room with her.
Cath was a very easy character to relate to – for me, at least. I feel as though this book was aimed towards the Caths of the world – the girls who sometimes prefer fictional worlds to the world we actually live in, the girls who don’t know how to be charming and friendly and likeable towards everyone they meet, the girls who get freaked out by situations that others seem to find so simple. I’m not saying that I (or anyone else, for that matter) am exactly like Cath, but it was clear right from the first few pages that she was going to be someone that I would be able to see myself in. For example, I can completely understand how she could go a month living in university halls without knowing where the dining hall was, even if something like that seems unbelievable to other people.
I was quite confused by Reagan and Levi’s relationship. When they were first introduced, I thought they were brother and sister, and actually carried on thinking that for about half the book. I would be interested to know if anyone else thought they seemed like brother and sister too, or if their relationship was easily understandable to most people.
To be perfectly honest, I didn’t think this book was the best-written book in the world. It was what I was looking to read, and I’m really glad I read it, but it won’t be joining my list of favourite books, and I definitely preferred Eleanor and Park much more. I’m also glad I was able to read this book over the course of about three days, since I’m not sure I would have wanted to spend a long time on it. That said, I really enjoyed this book and completely understand why other people love it. I also really liked the little fanfiction snipets featured throughout the book.

Little Dorrit by Charles Dickens

I love Dickens. I don’t read many classics, but I do love Dickens. It was mainly for that reason that I decided to read Little Dorrit. I didn’t quite realise before I started just how big a book Little Dorrit is, which meant that it took me quite some time to read, since I am a fairly slow reader. What was good about this particular choice of book was that it is one of Dickens’ lesser known works, meaning that I was able to read it without having any inkling of what was coming next, unlike with A Christmas Carol or Oliver Twist.
Little Dorrit is the nickname of Amy Dorrit, who was born and grew up in a debtors’ prison, where her father is an inmate. Little Dorrit is a quiet, hard-working young woman who tirelessly looks after her family. She meets with the other protagonist, Arthur Clennam, who has recently returned to London from many years abroad and is attempting to put right a suspected wrong on the part of his parents.
One of the things I really liked about this book was the recognition of the value of introverts. In our society, loud, out-going people are often thought of as the ideal, but this book emphasises the importance of quiet determination and confidence. The final sentence was particularly effective for me in summing this up, as it spoke of quiet people stepping into a life of love and duty, while around them society continues to make unnecessary noise and suffering. The book also stresses the benefits of being selfless and forgiving, pointing out that of Little Dorrit had ever been bitter or ashamed about her circumstances, she would have struggled to find contentment and would not have been so respected by those who know her. She understands better than most people the importance of being loving and forgiving, as revenge can only lead to more unhappiness.
Another thing I have to say is that I love Young John Chivery. To be perfectly honest, I hoped that he and Amy would end up together. He is a genuinely decent and kind person and was the only person in Little Dorrit’s life for a long time who wanted to look after her, rather than expecting her to look after him. I understand that Amy just wasn’t attracted to him, and I liked that she was able to make that choice for herself, but I still think it was a shame that he was left heartbroken at e end of the book. I seriously admired the way he makes sure he looks after Arthur for Amy’s sake, even when Arthur neither understands or fully appreciates what he is doing. In a pretty dark book where even the sympathetic characters had their flaws and weaknesses, it was refreshing to see John’s simple acts of kindness with no expectation of reward.
I also felt a good deal of sympathy for the other unrequited lover in this book. Flora comes across as a bit silly and ridiculous, but I feel that Arthur is actually quite harsh in his perception of her. It’s understandable that Flora might cling to a young and slightly immature version of herself, because she has had the experience of being in love and being loved back when she was the age that she continues to act like. I think that she is unsure how to act around Arthur, who she hasn’t seen in over a decade, so she attempts to act the way she did when they first met. She displays patience and gentleness towards Mr F’s Aunt, and kindness and generosity towards Little Dorrit. She never quite gives up on the hope that she will one day marry the man of her dreams, even though it is evident to the reader that this is unlikely to happen, and I feel that Arthur could be more considerate towards her than he is.
One thing I felt wasn’t resolved particularly well was Tattycoram’s story. I found Tattycoram one of the most interesting characters in the book, and I understand her actions. Although the Meagleses were well-meaning and attempted to help her, they failed to provide the kind of help she wanted or needed. She has never had a family, and had hoped when the Meagleses took her in that they would adopt her, and care for her like a daughter. Instead they employed her as a maid, and were patronising towards her, despite never being unkind or impatient. I don’t really understand why they didn’t adopt her, especially since they had lost a daughter. I don’t mean that they would seek to replace Pet’s dead sister, but they strike me as the sort of people who would consider adoption. I recognise that Miss Wade was not a good influence on Tattycoram, but I kind of wish she had had some better ending to her story than simply going back to where she started.
I also don’t really understand why Miss Wade wrote down her “history” for Arthur to read. She often speaks of having no desire for other people to have a good opinion of her, so it seems strange to me that she would write her story down at all. Aside from that, I don’t understand why she addressed this “history” to Arthur. She didn’t know whether or not she would ever see him again, and after writing it, she made no attempt to post it, but instead kept it for some considerable length of time. I also wonder why it was ?Arthur in particular that she wanted to understand her.
I realise that this is a long review, but this was such a big book and such a complex book that I actually still have a lot more to say. I’ve started watching the BBC tv adaptation and I would definitely recommend it. I also definitely recommend this book. Its dark themes and complicated characters make it unforgettable, and it’s simple but honest message continues to ring true today.

the Earthsea Quartet by Ursula le Guin

IMG_0334.JPG
I have to admit that I completely judged this book by its cover. I saw it in a bookshop, the cover caught my eye, and I bought it. There was no blurb on my copy, so I didn’t even have a brief synopsis, but there were dragons on the cover, and I reasoned that dragons are always good to read about, so I got quite excited about reading a book that I essentially knew nothing about for the first time.
The Earthsea Quartet is a fantasy series set in a world made up of hundreds of little islands, where dragons exist and wizards are trained to fight for good or for evil. The series follows the adventures of Sparrowhawk, a wizard, along with various other characters, including Arren, a prince, and Tenar, a child priestess.
I’m sad to say that I was a bit disappointed by this book. I felt as though it just didn’t really add anything to an already-existing genre. In all fairness, I probably read this book at the wrong time, since I was really wanting to read The Winds of Winter which hasn’t been written yet and thought starting a new fantasy series set in another fantasy world would be a good substitute, and I probably shouldn’t have read all four books at once, as if they were all one big book, but I knew that if I didn’t I would never come back to this series, and I wanted to persevere with it. Nevertheless, I felt like there wasn’t a lot of character development and there were points where the book really lagged.
That said, I did really enjoy The Tombs of Atuan and I quite enjoyed Tehanu as well. I think a lot of that was to do with them being told from Tenar’s perspective, who was probably the most interesting and complex character in the series. Tehanu was also written in a very different style and offered the most in-depth character development, particularly in Sparrowhawk’s case, while dealing with some important issues in society, such as sexism and child abuse, and even threw some romance into the mix. However, despite being an enjoyable read, the final book in The Earthsea Quartet was lacking in plot development and had a rather rushed and confusing conclusion which left a few loose ends still dangling.
Even A Wizard of Earthsea had some enjoyable parts. I loved Vetch and was genuinely moved when he told Sparrowhawk his true name.
Aside from all else, this is probably the only fantasy series I have ever read where the hero is not white, and I was very impressed with the racial diversity within the book.
All in all, this was not a bad book, but it is not one I would be in a hurry to read again, and I’m unlikely to recommend it to anyone else.

Characters in A Song of Ice and Fire

One of the things I love most about George R R Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire is the brilliantly written, complex characters. Having recently finished reading A Feast for Crows, I was thinking about which characters I like the best, and why. I’ve also noticed that my feelings towards certain characters have changed over the course of the series.
Tyrion remains possibly my favourite character of the series, despite not actually appearing in A Feast for Crows. I just think his wit is incredible, and he appears to be one of the few people unafraid to stand up and put Joffrey in his place. I actually felt quite shocked, as the series went on, at the way he is mistreated and under-appreciated, even by the people he is supposed to be fighting alongside. Despite remaining stubbornly loyal to his family for most of the series, it seems that it is those people who should trust him who are bent on destroying him, and who go to great lengths to deny the enormous part he played in protecting King’s Landing from war.
However, speaking of the Lannisters, I must admit that I’m feeling increasingly sympathetic towards them. As I read on, I realise that they did not do all of the things I had previously thought they had (namely, starting the war in the first place) and I find myself trying to make justifications for the things that they did do. I actually kind of love Jaime, now, and when I admit this fact to friends who have only just started the series, I always have to respond to their horrified looks with “Don’t judge me – he gets better!” I truly think that Brienne was an extremely good influence on him, and I’ve been known to say something along the lines of, “Apart from throwing a child out of a window, he’s actually a really nice guy…” As for Cersei, well. I love to hate her. I can’t quite bring myself to like her – she’s just too awful. But at the same time, I enjoy her being in the series and do feel sorry for her at times.
One way in which I differ from many ASoIaF fans is that I’m never entirely sure whether I like Arya or not. I just think that she’s a little too ruthless and bloodthirsty – especially for a young girl. Also, I often feel as if she was orchestrated to be generally loved, and for that alone, I’m not entirely inclined to like her the way others do.

NOTE: I have not yet read A Dance With Dragons, so please, NO ONE tell me anything!

Edmund Pevensie (again)

I’ve said before that I hated Edmund for most of The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. However, I think that he is now starting to emerge as my favourite of the four Pevensie children. After reading Prince Caspian, I now kind of love him, and I think that he is by far the most developed character in The Chronicles of Narnia.
I am glad to say that Edmund has well and truly learned the error of his ways. He is no longer spiteful, selfish, unkind or dishonest, and I think it’s amazing how much he has managed to grow. As opposed to before teasing Lucy mercilessly for claiming to find a magical world in the back of a wardrobe, in Prince Caspian, he is the only one who believes her when she says she sees Aslan, even though he can’t see him himself. This faith in his younger sister is even stronger as a result of his earlier cynicism. The evidence of just how far Edmund has come is in Aslan’s words of greeting to him: “Well done.”
Edmund was interesting, and by far more interesting than the rest of the characters. The reason for this was that he wasn’t perfect, which is okay, since no real person is. He got annoyed at the others putting fish in his hat (and, after all, who wouldn’t?). He teased Trumpkin, although fairly amicably, nicknaming him the D.L.F. (Dear Little Friend). He intends to be supportive to Lucy, but ends up snapping at her, as a result of being woken up in the middle of the night.
There are also some points in the book where he does some things that are just incredibly daft, such as eating earth because he thought it looked like chocolate, or leaving behind his torch in Narnia. To me, these moments were endearing, and adding more realism to his character.
The transformation of Edmund in The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe to Edmund in Prince Caspian is astonishing and one that I really appreciated. I loved coming to love his character, and I loved that even when he was King Edmund, he was still really just a daft wee laddie.

Eleanor and Park by Rainbow Rowell

IMG_0059-0.JPG

Rainbow Rowell is another one of these authors who I knew I would like but took way too long to get around to reading their books. I’d heard such good reviews of Eleanor and Park and I’m glad to say that I finally read it, and loved it.

Eleanor and Park is basically a teenage romance between the two titular characters. Eleanor is the new girl at school and struggles through bullying for being fat and “weird” as well as abuse from her incredibly unpleasant stepdad. Park is one of a few Asian kids at school and is only just cool and unnoticeable to avoid the wrong sort of attention from the kids up the back of the bus.

I really thought I’d grown out of this sort of book. But, then again, maybe no one ever does. The plotline seemed a little simplistic and, overall, “teenage”. However, I found I couldn’t help but dive into it headfirst. I was torn between reading it and not reading it – reading it, because it was such a compelling read that I wanted to just curl up and read it cover to cover in one go, but not reading it, because then I would finish it, and it would be over.

This book really explored the idea of “conventional beauty”. Neither Eleanor or Park think of themselves as attractive in the slightest, while at the same time considering the other to be like a work of art. They both seem to have features that are not what it seen as being generally attractive, and yet can be incredibly beautiful to certain people. park in particular is misled in his belief that Asian boys cannot be attractive, as they look too feminine.

To me, Eleanor and Park seemed so much more realistic than other, more popular young adult romances. The characters aren’t pretentious, or they at least feel acutely embarrassed after saying anything resembling a deep thought or metaphor. “I love you” is painful to say, because they are incredibly self-conscience . They are also self-absorbed, to a degree, because they are people and they are teenagers and that is what makes them so believable.

Trying not to give away any spoilers, I have to say that the ending drove me crazy. I was convinced there had to be just one more page. It took me much longer than it should have to accept that there wasn’t. I think I understand now, but at the time it was nothing short of infuriating.

I would recommend this book to anyone who loves a good drama or a romance of any kind.

The Gospel of Loki by Joanne M Harris

The mere existence of this book excited me immensely. I’ve always had a love for mythology, especially Norse mythology, and within that, Loki in particular fascinated me. He was so cunning, so clever with words, so incredibly likeable. I’m always ready to hear another story of his meddling ways. So to know that I was not alone in my love of this Trickster, and that someone had actually written a book that revolved around his point of view was incredible.
The Gospel of Loki is what it sounds like. It is the story of Loki, a demon trickster god, told from Loki’s own perspective. Not the most powerful of the gods, he relies on the power of his cunning, persuasion and trickery to influence others and to save his own skin. Loki is in many stories a villain, and in some a hero, and in this book he is both.
Loki is in many ways an anti-hero. He has many flaws, which lead him into making decisions that result in tragedy for himself and for others. However, I think it is important to remember that Loki is not so much immoral, as amoral. Most of us grow up being taught basic universal laws, common manners and human principles, so that by the time we are adults, we accept them as truths which everyone knows. On the other hand, Loki began his life in Chaos, where there are no rules. By the time he joins the gods, he has spent decades in a place where no one has morals and everyone acts on instinct. As a result, he cannot fully understand the concept or the point in things such as honesty, loyalty or monogamy. I doubt if Balder, the god of peace whom Loki refers to as Golden Boy, would have turned out as a much better person under the same circumstances.
This book had a very strange beginning, which I suppose was to be expected, as it begins with the Norse version of the Creation story. I found the book a little hard to get into at first, and even felt slightly disappointed in it, since so far the book was not living up to my high expectations. However, sticking with it was a good choice, as it gets much better – more interesting, exciting, and even very dark towards the end. My immediate thought after finishing the book was that I wanted to go back and start it again.
Aside from a couple of main characters around whom The Gospel of Loki revolved, the book also had a whole host of great minor characters. One of my favourites was Loki’s crazy but well-intentioned wife, Sigyn, with her never-ending supply of cake. She is loyal, caring, and well-meaning, but also naive, ridiculous and completely insane. I would have liked to have seen more of her relationship with Loki, and the couple’s relationship with their sons, which I felt the book kind of skipped over.
I’ve said before that the book turns very dark at the end, and it does. Loki tells the reader within the first few chapters that the book ends with the end of the worlds, so you can’t expect a happy ending. What I wasn’t expecting, however, was the note of hope at the very end. This is why I love Loki. Only a book with him as the protagonist could end with the end of the worlds, and still leave the reader wondering about the possibility of a sequel.
I would recommend this book to those who love mythology, clever trickery and an underdog. I will always love Loki, no matter what his flaws may be.

Sunset Song by Lewis Grassic Gibbon

20140714-155752-57472694.jpg

This is the sort of book that gets studied in English lessons across Scotland. And so, I know it will be hated by many (who had to read it) and loved by many (who thought it a classic amongst Scottish literature and therefore worthy of being taught in schools). This book is also hated and loved for the way it is written as someone from the northeast of Scotland would speak, and is therefore difficult at first to understand and yet almost like a form of poetry, or lullaby.

Sunset Song is the story of Chris Guthrie, a farmer’s daughter growing up in Scotland around the time of the First World War. Told over the course of several years, the book shows what Chris’s life is like, the choices she makes, and the damage done to her and her town during the war.

The language and sentence structure of the book made me wonder how someone from outside of Scotland would understand it. I’m Scottish, but from a different part of Scotland, and don’t speak anything like how Chris Guthrie would have done. This meant that I understood some of the Scots words, but had to look a lot of them up, and there were some that I recognised but as being spelt differently. I suppose in the same way I understood Chris’s love of the land, despite its mournfulness, and the way she is torn between Scots and English, although not nearly to the same extent. Thus, I felt a sense of being able to relate to it, but at a remove. I believe that the story and characters in the book can be enjoyed the world over, and it’s a shame if people are put off from reading it because of the language, because it has a beauty all its own and is utterly untranslatable.

Kinraddie, it’s clear, is a very small town. And yet it becomes almost Chris’s whole world. People from anywhere outside of it – even the neighbouring towns – are described as being “coarse”. It’s strange that a place so geographically small can seem so big to those living in it, but the same is true again for Scotland.

The book is narrated in the third person, but is told almost entirely from
Chris’s point of view. At some points, it is actually almost as if Chris is speaking to herself. Hence, we see for the most part only Chris’s viewpoint and the viewpoints of those whom she understands. In contrast, the prelude and epilude are told as if from the point of view of the general villagers and town gossipers. In this way, these people are presented as sheep, in much the same way as how after Kinraddie’s men have been killed in the war, others buy their land and graze sheep there. It’s as though all the individuals of Kinraddie have gone, leaving only mindless sheep.

Chris is, to me, the ultimate strong female character. Everyone makes a huge fuss over whether a female character is strong or not, and whether it’s wrong to define women as “strong” or “kickass”, as it implies that the majority of women are not. Chris is certainly not “kickass”, but she is strong. She knows what’s best for her, and she doesn’t let what other people say bother her. She also doesn’t let her husband have control over her – she gives as good as she gets. That’s what I think a good strong female character should be – someone who doesn’t care what people will say, she does what she knows to be right.

Throughout reading the book, I wondered why it was called Sunset Song. It wasn’t until the last page that I understood, when it spoke of the sunset of the days of the ploughmen, of the Old Scots. Everyone realised that times were changing and that there was no going back to the way things were before the war. I suppose the song was Flowers of the Forest, but it could have been any of Scotland’s songs, as it is previously acknowledged that all old Scottish songs are full of loss and grief and mourning and unhappiness. This also ties in with Chris’s recognition that “Nothing endures but the land.” Times may change, and so will the land, but it will always, always be there.

One thing that annoyed me a bit about the book was that it took a while to get into it properly. I felt as if it didn’t get particularly interesting or engaging until about halfway through, which was a shame. I am glad, however, that I didn’t give up on it, as it was worth reading through to the end.

This book was unique and beautiful and is a great read if you like historical/wartime dramas and Scottish culture and language.